Yesterday while I was out with some friends, I learn something old and something new. Old because of hearsay of the credibility of the US Patent Holder on the Dermatoglyphics Multiple Intelligence test system. New because I went to their new living space.
Old news to clear the name of Professor Lin and his team:
Initially when I started with the DMIT business, many questioned my status for not being connected with medical doctors because I have not told anybody that I am a Dentist as per instruction by Professor Lin. According to Professor, children are usually afraid of people in white coat.
When they learned I am a Dentist, the next question when they look at the report was “why? are you teacher?” I answered Yes.
It stopped for awhile. Then I created the job title DMIT Consultant as I am less than a year in the DMIT world. When I was interviewed, they also questioned my title and even misspelled my name publicly.
The acronym CEO means Chief Executive Officer was created by the Americans and the acronym MD means Managing Director was created by British people. All new job descriptions were created from something. wikipedia.
Next, my nationality was also questioned by the same people, though I told them am a natural born Filipino with Chinese ancestry, they still insist I am Chinese with sarcasm on their voices.
News excerpt from Manila Bulletin headlines dated June 10, 2015 titled Stronger PH-China ties
Not just between two countries but also people to people
Then they asked when was it patent and was very disappointed that it is still very far from re-patent the test system.
I went to the Intellectual Property office in the Philippines and asked can this test system be re-patent in the Philippines? According to them, No. Only the patent holder of the test system can re-patent it as it is not a new invention. Since Intellectual Property Office is considered international, it also follows international standard laws.
This is the reason why if you are applying for a new business name, DTI for sole proprietors or business partners checked your application whether the name you chose are already existing in other countries even same sounding is not acceptable
Then on the show itself they produced a palm and posted it online, as prior to their interview, I already knew some people planning to patent Palm reading in the Philippines. When I got the test system, I already knew Palm reading is fortune telling Professor Lin and his staffs and team has already informed me before hand. I never questioned it as I trust they did their own study.
For the second time, I was interviewed, they asked me to invite a client meant for human resource, as the client was really amazing soon after she took the test, from a mere employee became a manager in less than 6 months and a higher salary, the interview was never shown or aired. My client even went out of her way to look really presentable but both of us were really disappointed.
Then came the launch of Encycligent when Professor Lin was in the Philippines, he was now being questioned of not being able to speak a single English, how was he able to patent it in the US?
It is like asking a foreign national joining an international beauty pageant who is not an English speaker on how they won their title outside their country. If we do watch this kind of contest, we will notice some of the contestants have interpreter.
There are some products being sold in the Philippines was patent in Japan but not sold in Japan but meant for the purpose of another company outside Japan, but it does not mean that the owner of the patent has to know Japanese language.
The integrity of the Intellectual Property Office is exceptionally great for inventors.
Then, the same company who interviewed me for the second time questioned the book report as not being “grammar correct” as they say and ask to have a book report for editing, since I am not an English major, I let them but turned out the integrity of this company is now in question, since last year up to this time, they could not return my book report to me.
The book report was translated by an Asian who graduated in a University in America. They did not have any issue with the “grammar” prior to offering the report to the Philippines.
Then they questioned the need to release the formula of Professor Lin for use with Human Resources. Someone gave me an advice:
Keep your trade secret, if I release the formula, it is like giving away my business for free, not just mine but for the rest of the clients of Professor Lin.
met someone who is interested with the Genuine test system and according to them, its similar to Cohen Diet, send your profile to the US, then they will send you a list of things for your diet but it will not show how one analyzed it.
an inquiry from my website and now using the test system and according to her, what is important is the report itself, the accuracy. Formula not important to them.
if you apply for a school and was not accepted, do they tell you how they analyzed it?
The DMI Test is no longer in question. It is not a written test, not psychological test, no interview, not a medical device.
Now I understand why Professor Lin was looking for the same kind of fingerprint that I have. Loyal fingerprint.
Hope this will clear questions on Professor Lin and his test system.
Thank you for all our readers.